The physicist

- Aniere, you made a twisted speech to try to find the number of the Beast of the Bible but I am inspired by  luminous interferences. I can't give any support to your proposal. This arrangement to achieve a particular explanation is no proof that could be used to support scientific studies. Listen to me now!
You are obsessed by 666! Please! At least,  know that Newton untied the light mystery during the year 1666. He made it public during the year 1669.

- That's an enlightening source!

- In his attempt to explain light, Descartes highlighted contradictions between the two components of corpuscular or undulatory natures of light.

To interpret what you see at the center of this enclosure, you have to formulate the physical explanation because we can see images of light-waves. 

Two luminous rays, while crossing, come  to create zones of shade and light. This phenomenon is called interference. The interferences can be constructive when the propagation occurs in the same direction, or destructive when it is done in a contrary direction, which produces shade.
This enclosure is the image of the phenomenon of interferences.

- I support your statement as it is necessary for a spiritual enlightenment. There is an historical interference over the year 1666.

- Who is speaking?

- I 'm the one wearing the donkey's skin. Don't you recognize my voice? I'm telling you something that supports both of your illuminations.
In 1666, Newton discovered the composition of light and the French minister Colbert created  the Royal academy of Sciences. He abolished the study of astrology.

- I know, I know. It was in the year 1666  that the Bible Beast was crowned.

- Aniere, it is the child again. Stop making light of anything!

- This boy knows his own mind. Let's go back to our purpose! Thank you physicist, it's exact. It is exact but incomplete. "Three quarks for Muster Mark?"(*)

- This quotation  inspired  modern Physics. the quark is the name of a theoretical particle from which the concept is only accessible by mathematical abstraction. We don't know how these elementary particles are generated and elaborated from others even more elementary.

- And what about the theory of the bootstrap?

- It's a vocabulary employed by researchers to illustrate the thesis stating that the elementary particles would not be generated by others but that they would represent the assessment of strong interactions at a given moment. The whole of  the particles would be generated by itself. For modern Physics, S is the quantum number.

- Physicist, with interferences, could you then  paint the physical portrait of a man?
 
(*) in James Joyce, Finnegan's Wake